One Goes to Court with One Lawsuit and Comes Home with Two

Email *
  • One Goes to Court with One Lawsuit and Comes Home with Two

    August 31, 2016 / 2 COMMENTS /

    Sarter's Pistol blog_image from court room

    Senior Judge Michael Scopelitis raised an interesting (and, unfortunately, common) problem at a bar meeting some years ago.  He explained how he had just entered another order for legal fees from one parent to the other parent’s attorney in a divorce case.

    What stood out, Judge Scopelitis explained, was that the dispute was over how the parents would divide their responsibility for a college tuition bill—and the fees for just one of the two lawyers had already exceeded the college bill itself.

    Intending to be humorous, one of the lawyer’s in attendance blurted out, “So what’s wrong with that?”  The room of attorneys erupted in brief laughter.

    How funny this all-too-common event actually is can be debated.  (One has to doubt that the family on the receiving end of this legal experience would see the humor—or that the children living in the bitter family aftermath would.)  But this case, like so many others, can help teach an important principle about resorting to law.

    Especially in family cases (where the participants will be having thousands of future interactions), it’s a dangerous myth that legal rulings always put differences to rest.  Quite commonly, the opposite is true.  Here are four observations that may help make the point.

    • From Florida family attorney Sheldon (Shelly) Finman: “The judge’s decision is actually the starter’s pistol to the family’s odyssey of conflict.”


    • From Valparaiso University Law Professor Seymour (Sy) Moskowitz: “The real custody fight starts immediately following the judge’s custody decision.”


    • From Illinois family attorney Richard Kulerski: “Lawsuits don’t pay. You do.”


    • And from an old Danish proverb: “One goes to court with one lawsuit and comes home with two.”


    Experience teaches that it’s up to parents to maturely build their new relationship, one based on meeting their children’s need for peace in their family.  And that part of what parents must do is to arrive at some numbers compromise they can live with—and promptly move on.

    Court may be necessary in the unusual case (domestic abuse, withholding kid’s access to a parent, etc.).  But if yours is a more typical case, you may want to consider whether a judge’s ruling on last month’s three issues are really going to resolve the eight issues you’ll be running into next month.

    For more resources regarding the law, you and your family, please visit the Videos and Articles pages.


    Charlie Asher

    Charlie Asher

    Co-Founder of Freedom 22 Foundation, Co-Creator of at
    Charlie Asher

    Latest posts by Charlie Asher (see all)

    Categories: Uncategorized


    • glad that i am doing these recommended classes its giving me a better out look on alot of concerns i had as a parent an now i have alot of insight on how to deal with differnt situations i was going threw with other parent hope he be willing to compromise cause hes used to everything being hi way wish my self luck

    • This is so true. AJudges time should not be tied up with petty power struggles that cause so much pain, loss of time, money patience and respect for your family. A child that is struggling, suffering and/or in need of rescue should have the attention of a judge. Not a jealous new wife/husband marking territory to control the other parent, vendettas or power struggles. I like the exposure of this article to the reality that the only people who win in a court room or the lawyers in these cases and the biggest losers are the children. I have respect for the law but very little for people who prey on hurting families and drain their children’s college fund. Parents should make every effort to stay out of court.

    0 pingbacks

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2002-2020 Freedom 22 Foundatiton. All Rights Reserved.